“The fact that they think Chris Hayes is the “both sides” of Ben freaking Shapiro is, again, how white supremacists win,” he wrote. “I look forward to the day lets Louis Farrakhan and Mitt Romney edit dueling playbooks.”
I analyzed it: Įlie Mystal, Justice correspondent for The Nation, criticized Politico for defending having Shapiro edit Playbook by using the “both sides” argument. He revealed a belief by the GOP I hadn’t heard of before. I’m glad Politico let Ben Shapiro write Playbook today.
Jonathan Chait, a writer for New York Magazine, wrote in a tweet: I’m glad Politico let Ben Shapiro write Playbook today. Shapiro’s appearance drew backlash on Twitter for a variety of reasons. It’s not just Trump who deserves vitriol - it’s all 74 million people who voted for him.” “If you supported Trump in any way, you were at least partially culpable, the argument goes. “It doesn’t matter whether you held your nose when voting for Trump it doesn’t matter if you denounced his prevarications about a ‘stolen election,’” Shapiro wrote. Shapiro also argued that conservatives see “the game,” which he describes as blaming all conservatives for the actions of the president and the attack on the U.S. Shapiro wrote that that GOP opposition to impeachment comes from a “deep and abiding conservative belief that members of the opposing political tribe want their destruction, not simply to punish Trump for his behavior.” The House voted 232 to 197 to impeach Trump for a second time on Wednesday, with 10 Republicans siding with Democrats. The controversy came after Shapiro used the newsletter to defend the House Republicans who opposed impeaching President Trump over his role in inciting last week’s deadly riot at the U.S. Conservative media figure Ben Shapiro drew controversy on Thursday after he guest wrote Politico’s Playbook newsletter.
0 kommentar(er)
